Legal Opinion

Kuba v. Leb

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 1985No. 83-931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Considered in light of the requirement that:

“[i]n determining whether a specific instruction is erroneous, it should be considered with all the other instructions given, and the pleadings and evidence in the case. The proper test is whether the charge as a whole adequately presents the law upon the issues. In passing on a single instruction, it is to be judged in the light of all the other instructions given, bearing upon the same subject and if when so judged, the law appears to have been fairly presented to the jury, an assignment of error based on the challenged instruction cannot…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. TaitSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Brasier v. JearyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  3. Gallagher v. Federal Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Grimm v. Prudence Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  5. Life Ins. Co. of North America v. Del AguilaSupreme Court of Florida · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CSX Transp., Inc. v. WhittlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Cliff Berry, Inc. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Carter v. GottlebDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. CARLOS LORENZO GONZALEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API