Legal Opinion
Cooke v. Tankersley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 27, 1948No. 32146PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, C.J.
C. C. Cooke appeals from an order denying his motion for leave to intervene in cause No. 108638 in the district court of Oklahoma county.
With the motion for leave to inter - -vene, Cooke tendered a petition in intervention in which he alleged that Tankersley" Construction Company and Dan Tankersley were indebted to him on an open account and four promis*635sory notes aggregating the sum of $11,-517.64, with interest and attorney’s fees thereon, and he sued for himself and all other creditors of Tankersley Construction Company and Dan Tankersley similarly situated. He alleged that a trust resulted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Swift v. Black Panther Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Franklin v. Margay Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Porter v. RottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Gibson v. FerrellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Winston v. Stewart & Elder, P.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Barnett v. BodleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Mainord v. SharpCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Inergy Propane, LLC v. LundyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.