Legal Opinion

Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. Rowand

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1875PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bill to foreclose. On final hearing, on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The questions in this case arise between the holder of the second and third mortgages on the property and the lien *391claimants, as to the priority of these mortgages, or either of them, over the lien claims, and as to the allowance of the lien claims of Thompson, the architect and superintendent, and Warner, who furnished and put in the heating apparatus. The premises are what is known as “ Disnock’s brown stone house” and lot in Elizabeth. The land was owned, when the building was begun, (which was in 1870,) by Mrs. Dimock. She and her husband conveyed it, in 1873, to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennock v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
  2. Brooks v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  3. Freeman v. SchroederNew York Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schram v. ManaryOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Furlong v. Housing Authority of NewarkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API