Wilcox v. Pepsico, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum
GILES, District Judge.
Upon consideration of Pepsico’s Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment (Docket # 8), and the response filed thereto, the motion is GRANTED, and the complaint, as to Pepsico, is dismissed.
On December 22, 1997, Terry Wilcox (“Wilcox”) was allegedly injured in Mexico by a truck that was owned and operated by Pepsi-Bebidas Purficades de Mexico (“Pepsi-Bebidas”), a Mexican Company engaged in the business of bottling the Pepsi soda drink. Wilcox sued Pepsico, a North Carolina corporation with its principal place of business in the state of New York, under the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Lacey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Holiday Inns, Inc. v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. v. Rasa Floors, LPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Otto Candies, LLC v. KPMG, LLPCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2020