Legal Opinion

Durso v. Fiorini

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1929No. Appeal 203PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

The question is whether plaintiff should have execution on his judgment. It was entered on a judgment note executed by Giordana Fiorini dated September 3, 1926, payable one day after date. On the note was endorsed the following agreement:

“ ‘Mildred, Pa., Sept. 3, 1926.

This note is given to secure John Durso for cash payment of two thousand dollars on the real estate of Mrs. Giordana Fiorini in Mildred, Pa., and to be destroyed when deed is executed by said Giordana Fiorini and her husband, John Fiorini, of said real estate to said John Durso and in case deed is not made…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sanders v. BrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Lawall v. GromanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Integrity Title Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. RauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. O'Maley v. PuglieseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Pacific Lumber Co. v. RoddSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Terminal Realty Corp. v. Doubler, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API