People v. Wolf
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stouder
Henry J. Romanski appeals from an order finding him in indirect criminal contempt of court. We reverse.
Romanski was representing his client, Thomas Wolf, on a burglary charge. Wolf’s codefendant, Edward Hagerman, who had previously pleaded guilty to the burglary, was called by the State to testify against Wolf. The contempt allegedly occurred during the time of the trial.
At Romanski’s contempt hearing, Hagerman testified that on the day before he was to testify against Wolf, while he was in the Peoria county jail, a person he later learned was Romanski approached him. According to Hagerman,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The People v. StovalIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Tommy McNeal v. William Hollowell, Superintendent, Mississippi State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- People v. SiegelIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation of SwanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- People v. ArreguinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. James BeelerTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. SimacAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- In Re Estate of WernickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- People v. GorisekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.