Legal Opinion
Ewing v. Rodgers
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 12, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-M-2311PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MATSCH, District Judge.
This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by an inmate of the Federal Correctional Institution, Englewood, Colorado, claiming that he is being unlawfully detained because the United States Parole Commission has arbitrarily denied him conditional release. On February 22, 1982, Kent Patrick Ewing was committed to the custody of the Attorney General for treatment and supervision under the Federal Youth Corrections Act (“YCA”). The order of commitment was entered under 18 U.S.C. § 5010(b), which provides that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jerry Wayne Watts v. John T. Hadden, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Watts v. HaddenDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ewing v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Benedict v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Ewing v. RodgersDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1986
- Christians v. RodgersDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- Daniel G. Benedict v. George Rodgers, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute, Englewood, Colorado Norman Carlson, Director, U.S. Bureau of Prisons Helen G. Corrothers, Western Regional Commissioner, U.S. Parole Commission William French Smith, Attorney General of the United States, Kent Patrick Ewing v. George Rodgers, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute, Englewood, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.