Legal Opinion
Benedict v. Rodgers
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1984No. Nos. 84-1562, 84-1580PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
This joint appeal arises from two orders of the district court granting the habeas petitions of Daniel G. Benedict and Kent Patrick Ewing, both sentenced under the Federal Youth Corrections Act (YCA), 18 U.S.C. § 5005 et seq. (1982), and incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institute in Englewood, Colorado. Each petitioner challenged as arbitrary and capricious determinations by the Parole Commission not to alter their respective release dates. Af*544ter giving the Parole Commission an opportunity to clarify both determinations, the district court found that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jerry Wayne Watts v. John T. Hadden, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Timothy J. Adams v. O.J. Keller, Commissioner and the U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Ewing v. RodgersDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- Christians v. RodgersDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ewing v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- David A. Paz v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Englewood, Colorado United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Alexander v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Russ v. PerrillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Ewing v. RodgersDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.