Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Pulliam

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 13, 1947No. Record No. 3118PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.

This writ of error brings under review the proceedings of the trial in which George Pulliam recovered $7,000 for personal injuries sustained in a collision between an automobile driven by him and a passenger train operated by the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company at a grade crossing.

The parties will be designated as plaintiff and defendant according to the positions they occupied before the trial court. The plaintiff, having obtained a verdict, is entitled to have the facts stated substantially as follows: About 8:30 A. M. on December 7, 1944, plaintiff left the home of Dr. Traynham, his…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Siegel v. ThomanSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Virginian Railway Co. v. HaleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  3. Dawson v. PhillipsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Pearson v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  5. Ex parte DoyleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State of West Virginia v. Orville M. HuttonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  3. Hoge, Adm'r v. AndersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  4. Masters v. HartSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  5. Austin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API