Legal Opinion
UMC Electronics Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 10, 1999No. Nos. 93-709C, 94-450CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
HORN, Judge.
On June 23, 1999, the court issued an opinion on the merits of the above-captioned case after a lengthy trial. The opinion issued earlier by the court is incorporated into this order. In the opinion, the court held that the plaintiff/counter-defendant, UMC, had presented a fraudulent claim for equitable adjustment of a contract to the government on June 11, 1992. Pursuant to the Special Plea in Fraud statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2514 (1994), the court held that forfeiture of UMC’s claim against the United States was warranted. In addition, under the False Claims Act, 31…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gens v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,031 in Re Roberts Farms Incorporated, Debtor. Roberts Farms Incorporated v. Glenn Bultman John KellyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- SGW, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Unioil v. ElledgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Gens v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hernandez, Kroone and Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Veridyne Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Fadlalla v. Dyncorp International LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Lodge Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021