Legal Opinion

Belk Department Store of Charleston, S.C., Inc. v. Cato

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 14, 2004No. A04A0254PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Belk Department Store of Charleston, S.C., Inc. (Belk) appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment on the personal injury claims of Robert Cato, who was injured when he slipped and fell at a Belk department store. Since Cato failed to come forward with any evidence (and relied only on rank speculation) that a hazardous condition existed where he fell that caused his injuries, we are constrained to reverse.

On appeal from the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment, we conduct a de novo review of the law and evidence, viewing the evidence in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Holbrook v. StansellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Kenny v. M & M SUPERMARKETCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Adams v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Souder v. Atlanta Family Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Metts v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. El Ranchero Mexican Restaurant, No. 10, Inc. v. HinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Chapman v. CC DICKSON COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. H. J. Wings & Wings v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Ramotar v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API