Legal Opinion

Town of Somerset v. Dighton Water District

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.

The plaintiff, the town of Somerset, in one suit against the Dighton Water District seeks a declaration under G. L. c. 231A that the town has an exclusive right to use the waters and watershed of the Segreganset River for its public water supply system and that an alleged taking of the waters of the Segreganset be declared null and void. In another suit the plaintiff asked that the defendant be restrained from “any further action in execution” of the alleged taking. The cases were referred to a master. The defendant appeals from interlocutory decrees which denied the defendant’s motion to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. FiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Higginson v. Treasurer & School House CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Byfield v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Lynch v. ForbesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Friedman v. County of HampdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Filippone v. Mayor of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Massachusetts Association of Cosmetology Schools, Inc. v. Board of Registration in CosmetologyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  3. Arias-Villano v. Chang & Sons Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  4. Wright Ex Rel. Wright v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Rogers v. Town of PlainvilleMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API