Kettenhofen v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
— Petitioner Kettenhofen seeks to prohibit respondent superior court from punishing him for contempt for failure to comply with a preliminary injunction.
Brian and Edith Heath, real parties in interest, brought an action to establish an easement over a part of Kettenhofen’s land and to enjoin him from interfering with their use of the easement. On March 10, 1960, a preliminary injunction was granted by which Kettenhofen was ‘1 Ordered to remove the existing fence” along the boundary of his property and was restrained from using the easement for the storage or permanent parking of vehicles.
Durin…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Food & Grocery Bureau v. GarfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Katenkamp v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Byington v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3Cited by10 opinions
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1987
- Davenport v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Maheu v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark, Dept. No. 6Nevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Integrated Dynamic Solutions, Inc. v. VitaVet Labs, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Urs Corp. v. Venture, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.