Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ripley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 18, 2003PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY DEL SOLE, P.J.:

¶ 1 The Commonwealth appeals from the order granting Appellees’ motion to quash. Upon review, we reverse.

¶ 2 The trial court summarized the procedural history of this case as follows:

Defendants Calyn Arnold, Alexis Ba-denmayer, Curtis Dahn, Mark Debrew, Paul B. Osher, and George Ripley were charged with Possession of Instruments of Crime, Obstructing the Administration of Law or Government, Disorderly Conduct, Obstructing the Highway and Conspiracy. The charges stem from a protest at the Republican National Convention in Philadelphia in which the defendants attempted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. McBrideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. SpeightsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. RothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. AustinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MenezesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Smolow v. HaferCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Ildefonso-Candelario v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API