Legal Opinion

Little v. Wyoming County

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1906No. Appeal, No. 383PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 383, Jan. T., 1905, by plaintiff, from order of G. P. Wyoming Co., Oct. T., 1903, No. 68, discharging rule for change of venue in case of C. B. Little, Administrator of O. A. Little, v. Wyoming County. Rule for change of venue. Before Terry, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Error assigned was the order discharging the rule.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mestrezat,

Article III, section 23 of the constitution provides that: “ The power to change the venue in civil and criminal cases shall be vested in the courts, to be exercised in such manner as shall be provided by law.” By virtue of the authority thus conferred, the legislature passed the Act of March 30, 1875, P. L. 35, 2 Purd. 2068, providing the manner in which a change of venue in civil cases may be made by the courts. The first section of the act provides that “ changes of venue shall be made in any civil cause in law or equity: ” (1) When the judge shall be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Philadelphia v. Ridge Ave. Pass. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  2. Willoughby v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Petition of NewlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crawford's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Municipal Publications, Inc. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Apex Hosiery Co. v. Philadelphia CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Everson v. Sun Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API