Legal Opinion

Apex Hosiery Co. v. Philadelphia County

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1938No. 41, Miscellaneous Docket 7PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,,

The question is raised in the briefs as to whether the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania can change the venue in civil cases on original jurisdiction. This Court has all the powers of the English Court of King’s Bench by the Act of May 22, 1722, 1 Sm. L. 131, Section 13. The Act of June 16,1836, P. L. 784, Section 1, enlarges these powers. See Schmuck v. Hartman, 222 Pa. 190.

Article III, Section 23, of the Constitution does not take away from the Supreme Court any of its inherent powers, nor did the acts passed by the legislature pursuant tO' that section. See Commonwealth v. Reilly,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crawford's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Commonwealth v. BalphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Schmuck v. HartmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Summers v. KramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. In re QuaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carpentertown Coal & Coke Co. v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Gulf Oil Company v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. OndaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API