Legal Opinion
Becker v. Hollywood Theatre
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1934No. 14755PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover the balance alleged to be due on the purchase price of a “magnoscope picture screen.” Defendants pleaded prescription of three years. The trial judge maintained the plea and dismissed the suit and the plaintiff has appealed.
The record shows that on January 31, 1930, upon defendants’ written order,, plaintiff sold and delivered the screen for the price of $365 on account of which the defendants, on February 2, 1930, paid the sum of $25 leaving a balance due of $340; that the present suit was instituted on February 18, 1933; and that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Henry Block Co. v. PapaniaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Harman v. LegrandeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Bennett-Brewer Hardware Co. v. WakemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Bennett-Brewer Hardware Co. v. WakemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Alexander, Bolton & Lewis Ins. Co. Agency v. MayerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bonanno v. DecedueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Campo v. LaNasaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Reuter Seed Co. v. CroftLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960