Legal Opinion

Martin Meehan v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 2014No. 71S04-1308-CR-535PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID, Justice.

At Martin Meehan’s trial for class C felony burglary, the State offered into evidence, among other things, a glove containing Meehan’s DNA recovered at the scene of the burglary. Meehan was subsequently convicted of class C felony burglary, found to be a habitual offender, and sentenced to a total term of thirteen years in the Indiana Department of Correction. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his conviction. Finding that Meehan’s jury had before it substantial evidence of probative value from which it could have reasonably inferred that Meehan…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Drane v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Shuemak v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Mediate v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Breaston v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Drakkar R. Willis v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Shawn Blount v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Jeffrey A. Weisheit v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Kirsten L. Phillips v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Marquell M. Jackson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API