Legal Opinion

Shuemak v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1970No. 969 S 201PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.

This is an appeal from a conviction of second degree burglary. Appellant presents four issues for our consideration.

It is first argued that the conviction is not supported by sufficient evidence. The record shows that on November 28, 1968 a window of Bowen’s Oldsmobile, Inc., located in Rich-mand, Indiana, was discovered broken. Two window panes had been broken, one by each of the two' latches which secured the window. Inside the building a vending machine was found forced open. The money had been removed from the coin box. Upon investigation a fingerprint was discovered on the coin box. It…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fay v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Schmittler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Langley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Swift v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Hendrickson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Owens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hoskins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Tewell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Merry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API