Legal Opinion

Jones v. CGU Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided May 23, 2002No. 03-02-00057-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID PURYEAR, Justice.

This is an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of a pro se, in forma pauperis lawsuit as frivolous. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 13.001 (West Supp.2002). Because we conclude that there is no legal basis authorizing the pro se plaintiffs claims, we will affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Sandra Jones, who is allegedly disabled and indigent, first brought suit pro se against Crown Prince, Incorporated alleging that she purchased a can of smoked oysters manufactured by Crown Prince that made her violently ill shortly after she consumed them. She alleged that as a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Transport Insurance Co. v. FairclothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Johnson v. LynaughTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. McDaniel v. YarbroughTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight LinesTexas Supreme Court · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Time Warner Entertainment Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  2. West Houston Airport, Inc. v. Millennium Insurance Agency, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  3. Pain Control Institute, Inc. v. Geico General Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  4. John H. Carney & Associates v. State Farm LloydsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
  5. 15625 Ft. Bend Ltd. v. Sentry Select InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API