Legal Opinion
Baker v. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 20, 1982No. 80-3441PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves the government program established by Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f et seq. The Section 8 program provides housing assistance to low income families. More specifically, it is a rent subsidy plan under which owners of existing private housing receive *838payments on behalf of low income tenants. The funds, although released by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), are disbursed by local public housing authorities.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Vlandis v. KlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- The Detroit Edison Company v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Vandermark v. Housing Authority of City of YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Edith HARPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Freeman v. SullivanDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Mary Bakos v. Flint Housing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Baker v. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982