Arpin v. City of Thief River Falls
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court' for Pennington county to restrain defendant city, its officers, and the Tri-State Telephone Company, from entering into a proposed contract for the construction and operation of a telephone system within the city. From an order sustaining the demurrers of defendants to tbe complaint, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
The plaintiff brought this action to enjoin the City of Thief River Falls and the Tri-State Telephone Company from entering into a contemplated contract for the construction and operation of a telephone system within the city. The defendants demurred to the complaint for insufficiency of facts. From an order sustaining the demurrer, the plaintiff appeals.
1. The proposed contract provides that the Tri-State Company shall construct and equip a telephone exchange, with 450 telephones,, within the city of Thief River Falls; that the company shall operate the plant until the city…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Flynn v. Little Falls Electric & Water Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Shaubut v. St. Paul & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Grannis v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Nerlien v. Village of BrootenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Gundlach v. HammSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- City of Staples v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Gephart v. Hospital Facility Building CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965