Legal Opinion

Kunerth v. Kunerth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: On this appeal from an order awarding temporary alimony, and containing other provisions, plaintiff requests that we increase the award of $150 per week for her and her 18-year-old son and that we reverse the directive that she return to defendant a 1974 Mercedes-Benz automobile upon defendant delivering to her "a certain 1975 Fiat automobile”. The Mercedes-Benz is registered in the name of one of defendant’s operating corporations. As we have so often written, parties to a matrimonial action should not waste their assets and the court’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vesper v. VesperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. De Gasper v. De GasperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. Gelow v. GelowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Schoellkopf v. SchoellkopfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. Dobbin v. DobbinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sterlace v. SterlaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Clancy v. ClancyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Alberts v. AlbertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Cullen v. CullenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Keehan v. KeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API