Legal Opinion
Clancy v. Clancy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 11, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Defendant wife appeals from so much of an order of Special Term as denied her application for temporary maintenance pending divorce proceedings. Defendant claims that the court erred in failing to set forth each of the factors it considered pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6) (a), (b). We disagree. These factors do not govern temporary maintenance applications (see, Belfiglio v Belfiglio, 99 AD2d 462; Berley v Berley, 97 AD2d 726, 727; Liss v Liss, 87 AD2d 681, 682). On this record, Special Term did not abuse its discretion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Belfiglio v. BelfiglioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Liss v. LissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Berley v. BerleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Vesper v. VesperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Cloutier v. CloutierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCarthy v. McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Strong v. StrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Alberts v. AlbertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Cullen v. CullenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990