Legal Opinion

Dacotah Packing Co. v. Bertelson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1927No. File No. 5578PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an action on a promissory note, dated May 20, 1919, signed by the defendant, and promising to pay the plaintiff $7,000, with interest at 6 per cent per annum, one year after date. No part of the principal or interest hase been paid.

The defense is that the note was delivered conditionally, upon the understanding and agreement with plaintiff that it was not to take effect or be construed as 'being in force until a stockyards and packing plant in Rapid City, which the plaintiff corporation contemplated constructing, were completed, and if such stockyards and packing plant were not…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Longley v. DalySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Jefferson v. HewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Grant v. GrantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. FaulknerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Vincent v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alberts v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Piper v. Barber Transportation Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Klundt v. SandeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. First National Bank v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Geer v. CassemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API