Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided July 16, 2025No. 4:23-cv-00531Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA EVE WILSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 23-cv-00531-SH ) WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Walmart’s motion to enforce settlement agreement.1 Walmart contends it reached a settlement with Wilson through her then-attorney, Andrew Schwartz. The record demonstrates that Wilson gave Schwartz express authority to settle and that a legally enforceable agreement was formed. The motion will be granted. The Court, however, does not yet grant the requested relief of dismissal…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & JanerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Firstenberg v. City of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. United States v. HardageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Shoels v. KleboldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API