Legal Opinion

Lanford v. City of Sheffield

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1997No. 2951345PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case presents the issue of whether a city prisoner, injured while working as a "trusty," is an employee of the city under Alabama workers' compensation law.

On September 7, 1994, Mike Lanford began serving a jail sentence imposed as a result of his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol and related misdemeanor offenses in the City of Sheffield ("City"). In addition to the jail sentence, Lanford was fined. During his incarceration, Lanford worked as a trusty. On October 20, 1994, Lanford was helping a City employee get breakfasts for other City prisoners. While carrying the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Harrell v. Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Fulton v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. RI Council 94, Afscme, Afl-Cio v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  2. Gober v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Gober v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API