Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ward v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 8, 2017No. CR-16-858Published

1DissentRhonda K. Wood, Justice

The sole issue on appeal is whether the circuit court exceeded its authority when it resentenced Ward. I would hold the court did not exceed its authority; therefore, I dissent. The mandate, in its entirety, reads as follows:

This post conviction criminal appeal was submitted to the Arkansas Supreme Court on the record of the Pulaski County Circuit Court and briefs of the respective parties. After due' consideration, it is the decision of the court that the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed in part and remanded for resen-tencing in part for the reasons set out in the attached opinion.

it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dolphin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API