Legal Opinion

Manzoor v. United States Department of Justice

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 27, 2001No. 00-1971PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

Zeeshan Manzoor petitions for relief from the denial of his claims for asylum and withholding of deportation. To qualify for asylum, an applicant must show that he or she faces a well-founded fear of persecution. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) found that Manzoor had experienced past persecution in his native Pakistan on account of his political opinion, giving rise to a statutory presumption of a well-founded fear of future persecution. The burden then shifts to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to rebut that presumption. Here the BIA erred…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. ACOSTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985
  5. Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Arout Melkonian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Nourain B. Niam, and Peter Blagoev, Iordanka Kissiova, and Iana Kissiova v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Fidel Angel Hernandez-Barrera v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  4. Wan Chien Kho v. KeislerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. Settenda v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API