Legal Opinion

Chaplin v. National Surety Corp.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 1, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action, brought to recover of the surety the penalties of two probate bonds, is before us on report on an agreed statement of facts. There are *497six counts in the declaration, three of which apply to a bond dated November 28, 1921 in the penal sum of $2,000, and the other three to an additional bond in a like amount dated January 80, 1933. No permission to sue on the second bond has been obtained from the Judge of Probate, as required by R. S. 1930, Chap. 86, Sec. 17; and there is accordingly no jurisdiction to enter any judgment with respect to it. We are therefore concerned solely with…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hines v. AyotteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
  2. Neely v. Havana Electric Railway Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  3. Olsen v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Carpenter v. Estate of CoulombeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
  5. S S v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API