Legal Opinion

Hines v. Ayotte

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 9, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

This case comes up on exceptions by appellant, as Administrator of the Veterans’ Administration, to rulings of the Supreme Court of Probate of Maine, arising in litigation over the correctness of an account of the guardian, which was approved and allowed by the Probate Court. o

From a time prior to. April 12,1921, to June 6, 1935, appellee, as guardian of Walter J. Ayotte, an incompetent beneficiary of the Veterans’ Administration, a resident of Aroostook County, Maine, received and accounted to the Probate Court for funds of his ward.

From first to ninth account, filed January 10,1934, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Mattocks v. MoultonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892
  3. Chaplin v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
  4. Emery v. BatchelderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1886
  5. National Surety Co. v. McNeill's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of Peter C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. In Re Keisker's EstateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. Estate of WildeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. Casco Northern Bank, N.A. v. PearlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  5. Hines v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API