W. W. Kimball Co. v. Read
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John J. Van Nostrand, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
Plaintiff is a foreign corporation organized under the laws of the state of Illinois and having its principal place of business in Chicago. For some time prior to the institution of this proceeding it had been selling pianos to a retail firm located in San Francisco. This local firm sold these and other pianos to its customers in this state upon conditional lease contracts providing for progressive payments. One such contract was made between this local firm and the respondent herein covering a piano not sold to the local firm by appellant, and this contract was assigned to appellant.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Sioux Remedy Co. v. CopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Buck Stove & Range Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- American Amusement Co v. East Lake Chutes Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Gen. Conference of Free Baptists v. BerkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Detsch & Co. v. Calbar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Indian Ref. Co., Inc. v. Royal Oil Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Proctor & Schwartz v. Superior Court of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Raynolds v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.