Legal Opinion

Lyman v. Maypole

United States Circuit Court

Decided February 11, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.

This is a bill to enjoin an alleged infringement by the defendants of a patent issued to the complainant for an “improve*736ment in traps for exhaust steam pipes.” The object and scope of the invention is set out by the patentee as follows:

“The object I have in view is to provide the top of the exhaust pipe of a non-condensing steam-engine with a head which will not only trap off the water of condensation carried up the pipe with the exhaust steam, but also the grease used for lubricating the cylinder, and carried up by the exhaust steam. The invention consists in the peculiar construction of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  4. Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Kendall v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1859

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Craig v. Michigan Lubricator Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1896
  2. Lyman v. LymanU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API