Legal Opinion

People v. De Groot

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Exceptions before judgment from Ottawa; Padgham, J. Auke De Groot was convicted of a violation of tbe liquor law.

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, J.. The respondent was charged with a violation of the liquor law at the village of Zeeland, in Ottawa county. The undisputed facts are that the respondent had paid no tax in Ottawa county, and had filed no bond there. He claimed to be acting as the agent of the Grand Rapids Brewing Company, which had its place of business in Grand Rapids, Kent county. This company had paid no tax, nor had it filed a bond, in Ottawa county, though it had done both in Kent county. The respondent took orders from various persons for beer in quantities of eighth or quarter barrels, and not for less…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hahn v. FredericksMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Perkins v. DaconMichigan Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. VoorhisMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API