Legal Opinion

People v. Soule

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1889PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Exceptions from superior court of Grand Rapids.. (Burlingame, J.) Information for selling liquor without paying tax.. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The respondent was informed against in the superior court of Grand Rapids for engaging in the business of selling at retail spirituous, malt, brewed, fermented, and vinous liquors without first having paid to the county treasurer the tax provided by law therefor, and without having received from the county treasurer, and posted up in his place of business, a tax receipt; the said Soule not being a druggist, etc. He was tried and convicted of the offense charged, and this case comes to this Court for review on exceptions.

The facts admitted in the case, and upon which conviction was had, are as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marmont v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Commonwealth v. PomphretMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. In re HauckMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. State v. . LockyearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Cuzner v. the California ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State ex rel. Bell v. St. Louis ClubSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. State of Texas v. Austin ClubTexas Supreme Court · 1895

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API