Mize v. Questor Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Presiding Judge.
1. Since no constitutional attack was made below, or if made none was ruled upon by the trial court with reference to a portion or portions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act which are complained of, the attack made on this appeal, for that reason,* cannot be considered, and this court has jurisdiction of the appeal. Wiggins v. City of Macon, 224 Ga. 603 (163 SE2d 747).
2. Under the rulings made as to alleged negligence of the insurance carrier in making or in failing to make inspections of the working premises in Mull v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co., 120 Ga. App. 791 (172…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Wire & Iron, Inc. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Mull v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Gulf States Ceramic v. FensterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Yancey v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Mull v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burbank v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979
- Ponder v. Southern Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984