Legal Opinion

Coopersmith v. Perrine

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 27, 2012No. 4D11-3215PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Edward Coopersmith, the defendant below in a personal injury case, petitions for certiorari review of a non-final order granting plaintiff Elizabeth Perrine’s motion to overrule objections to interrogatories.

Coopersmith takes issue with a specific subsection of an interrogatory, which requires Coopersmith to furnish a “general summary of the opinions and basis of the opinions” offered by his medical experts in other cases.1 We grant the petition because the summaries will invade the privacy rights of non-parties, as protected by section 456.057(7)(a)(3), Florida Statutes (2010). See Graham v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. BoecherSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Elkins v. SykenSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Amente v. NewmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Crandall v. MichaudDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Graham v. DacheikhDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Christina M. Paylan, M.D. v. Timothy J. Fitzgerald, Esq.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Kristina Michelle Brana, Roscox Corporation, and Jordan Grabel, M.D. v. Adolfo RouraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. ORTHOPEDIC CENTER OF SOUTH FLORIDA v. MICHAEL SODEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. VerroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API