Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 2018No. S-17-707PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFunke, J.

*569 Jeremy D. Foster appeals from the denial of postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Foster asserts that he was prejudiced by ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and on direct appeal. We affirm the judgment below.

I. BACKGROUND

This appeal follows our decision on Foster's direct appeal in State v. Foster , 1 which affirmed Foster's jury trial convictions on one count of first degree murder, four counts **886 of assault in the second degree, and five counts of use of a deadly weapon to commit a felony. Foster and his codefendant, Darrin D. Smith, were charged with the same…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. AbdullahNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. HaynesNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. HenryNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. DubrayNebraska Supreme Court · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. ParnellNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. HoodNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. MunozNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Parnell v. FrakesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API