Legal Opinion

Frank Puddu v. Royal Netherlands Steamship Company, and Third-Party v. Maude James, Inc., Third-Party

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 15, 1962No. 27095_1PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*753WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, a longshoreman, was in the employ of the stevedore corporation, Maude James, Inc., when that corporation was loading refrigerator cargo into a reefer hatch of defendant’s vessel, M.S Helena. Plaintiff, during this operation, was the gangwayman standing by. Presumably, if there were need to give signals to winchmen, that would have been appellant’s function. Appellant was injured when one of the booms, part of the ship’s equipment with which the longshoremen were working, buckled and broke.

Appellant brought suit against defendant Royal Netherlands Steamship…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Samuel Mosley v. Cia. Mar. Adra, S.A., and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,v. Lipsett Steel Products, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Louis Antoine v. Lake Charles Stevedores, Inc., Lykes Brothers Steamship Company, Inc. And the Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Ferrante v. Swedish American LinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  5. William Norfleet and David Lane v. Isthmian Lines, Inc., Isthmian Lines, Inc., and Third-Party v. Whitehall Terminal Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API