Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McCaffrey v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 6, 1936No. 13,536Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Justice Young,

specially concurring.

I concur in the conclusions of the court and in the reasons supporting them as set forth in the opimon of Mr. Justice Holland, but inasmuch as certain cases were cited on rehearing that were not considered when the former decision was rendered, I deem it proper, as its author, briefly to refer to those cases as additional reasons for my present concurrence in the opimon of the court, wMch in part overrules the holdings of my first written opinion.

In that opinion it was held that the defense interposed by defendant, that is, that the plaintiff agreed to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mumford v. TolmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Randolph v. HelpsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  3. Faris v. BeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  4. Welles v. Colorado National Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  5. Wheelock v. HondiusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API