Commonwealth v. Pettiford
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This is an appeal from judgments of sentence imposed after appellant’s conviction on rape and other charges. Appellant now contends that the court erred in admitting the hearsay testimony of three witnesses, one of whom was allowed to recount the entire criminal episode of the rape in great detail, as told to her by the victim shortly after the rape occurred. The trial judge allowed this testimony as proof of “prompt complaint” by the rape victim. This was erroneous because hearsay allowed to prove a prompt complaint is limited to the fact that a complaint was made, and only so…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. PronkoskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. KrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. CooleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. GarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. MoralesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. SorrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. FreemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.