Legal Opinion

Inland Bridge Co. v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 1, 1976No. 7610SC262PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiffs assign as error the granting of defendant’s motion for dismissal. Under Rule 41(b) in a trial without a jury, the trial judge does not consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Instead, he must consider and weigh all the competent evidence before him, passing upon the credibility of the witnesses, the weight to be given their testimony, and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom. The trial court must make findings and conclusions in support of his order; and where the findings are clearly supported by the evidence, they are binding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Nello L. Teer Co. v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Nello L. Teer Co. v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Blankenship Construction Co. v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. S. J. Groves & Sons & Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Davidson & Jones, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of AdministrationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Hammonds v. LUMBEE RIVER ELEC. M'SHIP CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Chase Group v. Fisher, Clinard & CornwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Hammonds v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API