Legal Opinion

Wilson v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1963No. 9793PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, District Judge.

Personal injury action. The trial court (on motion for summary judgment) determined that the accident came within the scope of our Workmen’s Compensation Act and dismissed the proceeding. This appeal followed.

Appellant was a regular employee of respondent. She had taken advantage of her employee discount privilege by purchasing two room-sized rugs. During her lunch hour period she went out to the parking lot and got her automobile and brought it around to customer pickup for the purpose of taking delivery of said merchandise. She was about to back her car down the ramp…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Road Commission v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Henry v. Lit Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Geary v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Daniels v. Krey Packing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Mutti v. Boeing Aircraft Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Cycle Transformer Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. Askren v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Moser v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Thomsen v. SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Chen v. Federated Dept. Stores, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API