Eadie v. H.A. Sack Co.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Hearn, Justice:
This is a workers’ compensation case wherein three claims have been consolidated for appeal. H.A. Sack Company (H.A. Sack) appeals from an order of the single commissioner, affirmed by the commission and the circuit court, finding an au tomobile accident arose out of and in the course of the claimants’ employment. We affirm.
In July 1992, A.B. Garrick, H.A. Sack’s project manager, hired Harold Eadie as project superintendent for the Winsor II construction project located on Hilton Head Island. Eadie worked for H.A. Sack on two prior occasions and had been provided with a company…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fernander v. ThigpenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- JKT Co., Inc. v. HardwickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Howell v. Pacific Columbia MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Sola v. Sunny Slope FarmsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Bickley Ex Rel. Estate of Bickley v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- R & G Construction Inc. v. Lowcountry Regional Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Dukes v. Rural Metro Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Martin v. BayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- Aughtry v. Abbeville County School District 60Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Michael D. Royal v. Free Kindergarten AssociationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.