Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transp. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 1, 1931No. 13,806PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, J,
Plaintiff claims compensation under the provisions of Act No. 20 of 1914 (as amended), alleging that hie was employed by defendant as a laborer in its drayage business and that he was injured on the river front oü November 20, 1930, while, loading 1,000-pound drums on defendant’s truck.
The sole defense is that plaintiff does not come under the provisions of the Compensation Law because drayage business is not listed in the said law as a hazardous occupation dr business.
There was judgment in favor of plaintiff as prayed for, and defendant has appealed.
The evidence shows that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Byas v. Hotel Bentley, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Dyer v. Rapides Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Ferguson v. Cady-McFarland Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Plick v. Toye Bros. Auto & Taxicab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Franz v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
- Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Viator v. New Hotel Monteleone, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Hecker v. BetzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Tregre v. KratzerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.