King v. Avila
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of the defendants, Avila, Zapolsky, Tristano, Davis, Lombard, Overstreet, Smith and Cunningham for partial summary judgment as to counts III and IV of the complaint. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
FACTS
The parties have complied with local rule 12(e) and (f). The plaintiffs have raised numerous objections to the defendant’s statement of undisputed facts. A dispute about a material fact is “genuine” if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party. Anderson v. Liberty…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Khan v. American AirlinesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Dobiecki v. PalaciosDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Booker v. WardDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Bradley v. Avis Rental Car System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- David v. Village of Oak LawnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.