Kominczak v. Kominczak
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to reduce the child support payments previously ordered in a divorce action. The only question to be determined is whether the trial court’s action constitutes an abuse of his judicial discretion.
At the time of the divorce appellant had steady employment at a salary of $700.00 per month. Within a few weeks after the divorce he lost this job. The only job he was able to secure was as a dump truck driver. He is paid $2.35 per hour. He works a forty hour week with little overtime. He is unable to work during bad weather. Thus his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gully v. GullyTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Ex Parte GonzalesTexas Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by9 opinions
- Boriack v. BoriackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Labowitz v. LabowitzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Aguilar v. Barker, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Nixon v. NixonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.