Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Gonzales

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1967No. B-113PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

We need not' discuss all the contentions raised in relator’s brief because he must be discharged as the evidence adduced at the hearing which resulted in his commitment establishes his involuntary inability to comply with the court’s order requiring the relator to make child support payments. Ex parte De Wees, 146 Tex. 564, 210 S.W.2d 145 (1948); Ex parte White, 154 Tex. 126, 274 S.W.2d 542 (1955); Ex parte Padfield, 154 Tex. 253, 276 S.W.2d 247 (1955); Ex parte Kollenborn, 154 Tex. 223, 276 S.W.2d 251 (1955).

The following constitutes a chronological statement of the facts:

Feb…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DeweesTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Ex parte De WeesTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Ex Parte KollenbornTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Ex Parte WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Ex Parte PadfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ex Parte RohlederTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Ex Parte GorenaTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Ex Parte RamzyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Ex Parte DustmanTexas Supreme Court · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API