Legal Opinion
Reichert v. Pure Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 17, 1925No. Nos. 24,556, 24,557PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Plaintiffs are jobbers and distributors of petroleum products in the city of Red Wing and the territory tributary thereto. Since the year 1919 they have sold a line of such products known and advertised under the trade name of “Diamond” gasolene, kerosene and lubricating oils. The “Pure Oil Company,” a corporation organized under the laws of Sout¿ Dakota, was engaged in producing, refining and marketing petroleum products, and was the owner of a brand of gasolene known, advertised and sold under the trade name of “Energy” or “Energee” gasolene, and of a brand of motor oils known,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Express Co. v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Richmond v. Dubuque & Sioux City R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Watford Oil & Gas Co. v. ShipmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Rust v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Clausen & Sons, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Schalk Chemical Company, a Corporation, Gerald I. Farman, Hazel I. Farman, John Carver Baker and Patricia Baker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Target Stores, Inc. v. Twin Plaza Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Thompson v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.