Legal Opinion

State v. Carlos

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 17, 2016No. 03-14-00166-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting appellee Carlos Molden’s motion to suppress. In four points of error, the State argues that the trial court abused its discretion by suppressing the blood test evidence that was obtained in accordance with section 724.012(b) of the Texas Transportation Code, commonly known as the mandatory blood draw statute. See Tex. Transp. Code § 724.012(b). We will affirm the trial court.,.

BACKGROUND

Prior to trial, Molden filed a motion to suppress entitled Motion to Suppress Blood Alcohol Test Results Obtained Without…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Corrin Kathleen ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Perez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. State v. Cesar Ramiro Arellano, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2019
  4. Alfredo Ayala v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2016
  5. Fred Schneider v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API